Chemistry
Chapter 20 (7.5 points)
Research Study of Radon Gas
in the
This
is a long-term research project, scheduled to be completed by March 6th.
The project is worth a maximum of 7.5 points and will be part of your chapter
20 score. The chapter 20 score totals are as follows: Quiz = 4.0, Responsibility = 2.0, Chapter
written work = 2.5, radon research project = 7.5 points. Your tasks are outlined below.
Part I: Informational
brochure on radon (3.3 points)
Conduct
research using the internet to find information about radon. Present your
information in the form of an informational brochure. This
brochure should be designed to be helpful to residents of the
·
Explain the science of radon exposure. Be sure to include an
explanation of the type of radioactive particles involved and what specific
effects they have on the body.
·
What is the "acceptable" level of radon in air?
·
How often is indoor radon a problem in
·
How does radon get into a building?
·
Can the radon level in a building's air be predicted based on factors
such as location, year home was built, and structure and condition of the home?
·
Where can I get more information about radon issues?
·
How does
·
Why should I test my home for radon?
·
Who can test a building for radon?
·
What kinds of test devices are used?
·
Where in the home should testing be done?
·
What is a "picocurie" (pCi)?
·
If a test result is less than 4 pCi/L, what
should be done next?
·
If an initial short-term test results in 4pCi/L or higher, what should
be done next?
Part II:
Magazine Article (4.2 points)
BEGIN BY ANALYZING THE DATA:
You have received a
printed copy of the radon data from the
·
Year the home was
built: What is the average radon levels
found in homes older than 1950? In homes built between 1950 and 1990? In homes built between 1991 and present?
·
Presence of
cracks in basement: What is the average
radon levels found in homes with floor cracks?
What is the average radon levels found in homes with wall cracks?
·
Basement depth: What is the average radon level of homes with
deep basements compared to homes with shallow basements (less than 5 feet)?
If
you do not have access to excel at home, you may use the mobile lab computers
in science to complete the analysis.
Reorganize the data in a way that will allow you to prepare and print data
tables in which you present the average data for EACH of the three variables. Then use excel to
make a graph for EACH variable. Both the
data tables and the graphs must be included in your newspaper article.
WRITE A
MAGAZINE ARTICLE:
The
purpose of this article is to provide you with a forum in which to present your
data to the public. Writing the article
will strengthen your writing skills and your data analysis skills.
Write
a magazine article that explains what we did, what we found, and how this can
help residents of the
Be sure to look at the grading rubric to
make certain you are including all of the requirements.
Radon
Informational Brochure
3.3 points
Name:
|
Category |
Score |
Comments |
|
Colorful/Creative (0.4) |
|
|
|
Organization (0.4) |
|
|
|
Adequate/accurate
information included |
|
|
|
* What is radon? (0.5) |
|
|
|
* Science of radon exposure (0.5) |
|
|
|
* How radon enters building (0.2) |
|
|
|
* How to detect it (0.2) |
|
|
|
* IA/Cedar Valley info included (0.4) |
|
|
|
* What are high levels? (0.2) |
|
|
|
* How to fix it (0.3) |
|
|
|
* Where to get more information (0.2) |
|
|
|
Total (3.3 points) |
|
|
Grading Rubric
for Radon Magazine Article
4.2 points
possible
|
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
Part 1: Introduction |
· General overview is provided of how and where the data was collected. · Basic information about radon is included: brief overview of the science of radon, the dangers of radon, how it gets in the home, how it is measured, what are high levels, and how to fix it. · Importance of finding radon levels in your home and fixing high levels is effectively communicated. |
· General overview of how and where the data was collected is missing 1-2 key pieces of info. · Basic information about radon is included, but 2-3 of the following are not included: brief overview of the science of radon, the dangers of radon, how it gets in the home, how it is measured, what are high levels, and how to fix it. · Importance of finding radon levels in your home is communicated but the importance of fixing high levels is not effectively communicated. |
· General overview is provided of how and where the data was collected. · Basic information about radon is included, but four or more of the following are not included: brief overview of the science of radon, the dangers of radon, how it gets in the home, how it is measured, what are high levels and how to fix it. · There is no mention of the importance of finding radon levels in your home and fixing them.. |
|
Part 2:
Presentation of data |
· Average radon value and sample size is included for the entire data set. · One data table and graph are included for each variable. · All parts of the data tables and graphs are clearly labeled. · Data was correctly analyzed. |
· Average radon value is included. · Only 2 of the required 3 tables and graphs are included. · All tables and graphs are included, but the labeling is poor or they are incorrectly constructed. |
· Average radon value is not included. · One or fewer data tables and graphs are included. · Labeling of the table and/or graph is poor or graphs are incorrectly constructed. |
|
Part 3: Conclusions |
· Discussion as to whether or not it is possible to predict radon levels based on our 3 variables. · Reader is told where to get additional information. |
· There is a discussion of the predictive ability of the data, but one or more of the conclusions is inconsistent with the data. · Reader is told where to get additional information, but the sources are not the best. |
· There is no discussion of the predictive power of our data. · Not information is provided on where to seek additional radon information. |
|
Writing |
· Article is interesting & engaging. · Article is organized in a logical sequence. · Catchy title · Correct spelling, punctuation & grammar · Work neatly presented & visually interesting & easy to read. |
· Article is interesting and engaging. · Some sequencing is confusing to the reader. · Title is descriptive, but not creative · 2-3 errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. · Work neatly presented & visually easy to read. |
· Article is dull. · Organization is lacking, leaving reader confused. · Paper has no title. · 5 or more errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. · Work visually confusing &/or is hard to read. |
Total score: (Scores will be
adjusted to fit the 4.2 points possible for this assignment): ____________________